Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Flora v. United States Of America
as 5:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Pearl River County, Miss et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Franklin Harris
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Miss and Lenoir Rowell Criminal Justice Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flora v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Flora
as 22-51057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowell Flora, also known as Caranto Rowell
Flora v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Silas v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00928
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Rodney Jones, Billy Sparkman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Silas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craddock v. Lenoir Rowell Criminal Justice Center
as 1:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Hersey Dwayne Craddock
Defendant:
Lenoir Rowell Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Stevens et al
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Travis House
Defendant:
Gloria Stevens, Randy Johnson, Eddie Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Stephens et al
as 2:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
DeMarco Cooley
Defendant:
Gloria Stephens, Randy Johnson, Sheriff's Dept. Jasper County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00517
Defendant:
Unknown Coullard, Tracy Falgout, Randy Lavespere and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dale Rowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
