Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Redmond v. Young
as 5:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Tommy Redmond
Defendant:
Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richards v. Redmond
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Richards
Defendant:
Lori K Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. Kemp et al
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Eddie Byrd and others
Respondent:
Brian Kemp, Jimmy S Smith and Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redmond v. Lumpkin
as 22-50112
Petitioner / Appellant:
Randell Joseph Redmond
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Attorney General Dan Morales
Redmond v. Lumpkin
as 22-50098
Petitioner / Appellant:
Randell Joseph Redmond
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Stone et al v. Abbott et al
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Marlyn Bryd and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Davis
as 5:2020cv00803
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Randell Joseph Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01585
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Redmond v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv01414
Petitioner:
Preston Redmond
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
