Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Silvers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01320
Petitioner:
Danny Howard Silvers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silver v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Reginald Bernard Silver
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silverelk v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2020cv01532
Plaintiff:
River Silverely and River Silverelk
Defendant:
S Ma'at, McCollough, Tina LaBuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Silver v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2020cv00243
Petitioner:
Reginald Bernard Silver
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silver v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00227
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Reginald Bernard Silver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salgado-Silver v. USA
as 2:2016cv00127
Petitioner:
Rosalindo Salgado-Silver
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lawalter Rashaurd Mitchell
Defendant:
Billie Sollie, Unknown Robinson, Unknown McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe et al v. Wade et al
as 4:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Deborah Roe, Philadelphia Daily News and David Rothrock
Defendant:
Dwayne Wade, NBA, Vanessa Stiviano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silvers v. Young
as 2:2009cv01675
Plaintiff:
Dereke A Silvers
Defendant:
Joe Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carbe v. Lappin, et al
as 09-40147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON EARL CARBE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARVEY LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, TYRONE SILVER, Assistant regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, T C OUTLAW, Warden United States Penitentiary Beaumont Texas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
