Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Stevenson v. Medical Staff
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Grieve et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
FNU Grieve and J Leet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCann v. Terrell et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCann, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, Kevin Stevenson and Mike Mozingo
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McCann v. Mozingo et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCann, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Mozingo, Cynthia Terrell and Keven Stevenson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCann v. Terrell et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCann, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, Mike Mozingo and Kevin Stevenson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCann v. Terrell et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCann
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, Kevin Stevenson and Mike Mozingo
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
