Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Jeune v. Rule
as 4:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Tamara Jeune
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Joanie Fontenot, Jared O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliz v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Sheriff John Hooper, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eurings v. Gusman et al
as 2:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
Henry Eurings
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman, Ranking Officer Chapman, Officer Bazile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simmons v. Dr. Robinson et al
as 4:2022cv01673
Plaintiff:
Devin Simmons
Defendant:
Dr. Robinson, Tamara Oluwafemi and Nurse Mannly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas
as 22-40115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tamara Thomas
McCoy Sr. v. Newton
as 1:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Tashonda James, Tamara Stevens, Dah-Witt Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vetcher v. Unknown Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Supervisors et al
as 3:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Unknown Nakomoto Inspectors, Kenneth Keller, Tamara Harriss and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Alexandrovich Vetcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vetcher v. Unknown Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Supervisors et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Plaintiff:
Ivan Vetcher and Ivan Alexandrovich Vetcher
Defendant:
Unknown Nakomoto Inspectors, Kenneth Keller, NFN Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
