Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Castro v. Wallace
as 24-50379
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edward Castro
Defendant:
Warden Darren Wallace, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Chimdi Akwitti and others
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antoine v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Joanie Fontenot, Jared O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Conn et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Toby Ray James
Defendant:
Brad Conn, Heather Patterson and Mike Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Toby Lawrence Montgomery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antoine v. Terrell
as 2:2022cv06204
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant:
Terry Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antoine v. Cooley
as 22-30711
Petitioner / Appellant:
Toby Lee Antoine
Respondent / Appellee:
Keith Cooley, Warden, Allen Correctional Center
Porter v. Brewer
as 22-40582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frazier Porter
Defendant / Appellee:
Wayne Brewer, Toby Powell, Jordan Landrio and others
Rankin et al v. Willett et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Darwin Rankin, Kevin Sechrist, Sean Branham and others
Defendant:
Andrew J. Willett, Christopher Loflin, Jose G. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
