Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Daniell v. Fuller, et al
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniell
Defendant:
James Fuller, Brown County Jail, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Vance Louis White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00851
Petitioner:
Vance Louis White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Bonner et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
Michael R. Bonner, Travis Vance, Richard Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Schnieder et al
as 2:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Vance R. Scott, Sr
Defendant:
Paul Schnieder, Paul Connick, Jr, K. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Hill
as 6:2021cv00075
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen Leonard
Respondent:
Sheriff Vance Walton Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leonard v. Hill
as 6:2021cv01266
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen Leonard
Defendant:
Sheriff Vance Walton Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grizzle v. Marcum et al
as 4:2021cv03770
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Vance Marcum, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Old et al
as 5:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Vance Butler
Defendant:
Judge William Old, III, Texas Department of Public Safety and Board of Pardons and Paroles of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
