Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Vince v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Jerry Vince
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Phares A. Pickens
Defendant:
Michel Jones, Sandy Bourrage, Vince Carter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Moulds et al
as 2:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilson Earl Graves, III
Defendant:
Jamie Moulds, Jeff Monk, Vince Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv03446
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Dr. Theresa May, Ken Paxton and others
Petitioner:
Charleston Singletary
In Re:
Australia Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parfait v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2020cv01946
Plaintiff:
Vince Parfait
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter and Stephen Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 6:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bailey
Defendant:
W.R. "Rusty" Hierholzer, Vince Isley and Shelby Palermo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Villatoro-Avila v. State of Texas, et al
as 15-20678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MARIA VILLATORO-AVILA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ABBOTT and others
Jackson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv03696
Petitioner:
Vince Slade Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
