Cases 1 - 10 of 411
Rowe v. City of Austin
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Rowe
Defendant:
City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang v. Ms. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00788
Respondent:
Ms. Brown, Ms. Rebella, Mr. Contrell and others
Petitioner:
Barbara Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Preetorius v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00727
Respondent:
Mr. FNU Austin, Ms. FNU Rebella and Warden FNU Rule
Petitioner:
Regina M. Preetorius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marshall v. Mihalik et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Defendant:
Terrell Ellis, Brice Bishop, Ryan Mihalik and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Nelson v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lavar Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Austin Calvert, Sidney Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Parole Board Austin Texas
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Parole Board Austin Texas, Henry LNU and Christi Agulair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. LeBlanc
as 24-30100
Plaintiff:
Austin Frederick
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Angela Griffin, M. Lewis and others
Lightfoot v. Gilley
as 24-30046
Plaintiff:
Chad Lightfoot
Defendant:
Gary Gilley, Patricia Miller, Chief of Security Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
