Cases 21 - 30 of 133
Cerda et al v. III Office Resource Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Edelman Sanchez, Marvin Leonel Lopez Gramajo, Sergio Cerda and others
Defendant:
III Office Resource Group, Inc. and Paul Ross Lowe, III
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Acosta v. Sumerian Enterprises LLC d/b/a Back Nine, et al.
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Sumerian Enterprises LLC dba Back Nine, Justin Kaufman and Sumerian Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Montufar v. PHP System & Designs et al
as 4:2019cv02362
Defendant:
PHP System & Designs and Arthur James Valentz
Plaintiff:
Norman Alexander Montufar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Solis et al
as 7:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Nick Solis, Emily Solis and West Texas Bulldog Oilfield Services LLC Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sandul v. Z Mediterranean Cuisine, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alexander Sandul
Defendant:
Z Mediterranean Cuisine, LLC and Ziad Abdo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Mason et al
as 3:2019cv01202
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mas-Tek Engineering & Associates, Inc., Stephen Mason and Mas-Tek Engineering Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Ben E. Keith Company
as 5:2019cv00527
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Ben E. Keith Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Experience Infusion Centers LLC v. Alexander et al
as 4:2019cv01202
Defendant:
Texas Heart Rhythm Center PA and Aaron Alexander
Plaintiff:
Experience Infusion Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
