Cases 111 - 120 of 1,402
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. VIA Technologies, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
VIA Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Montemayor v Federal Judge Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Defendant:
Steve Montemayor, Federal Judge Parker, Judge Federal Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Cigar Palace and Bar et al
as 4:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cigar Palace and Bar d/b/a Cigar Palace and Bar and d/b/a Cigar Palace & Bar, Warrior Princess Enterprises LLC d/b/a Cigar Palace and Bar and d/b/a Cigar Palace & Bar, Yvette Y. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roberts v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
David Lane Roberts
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Richard Bynam and Valerie Wells
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Orlando Rentco LLC
as 4:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Orlando Rentco LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zenitel Group
as 6:2022cv01307
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Zenitel Group
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lynch v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04148
Petitioner:
Daniel Lane Lynch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Godwin v. Godwin et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Godwin
Defendant:
Glyn J. Godwin, Gerard Ruth, Charles Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
