Cases 11 - 20 of 618
Roberts v. Trochesset et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriff Henry Trochesset, Gale Lilliman, H.C.A. (Hospital) Houston Mainland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Wilson
as 24-40084
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Amber Wilson, Mike Davidson and James Young
Anderson v. Tiamiyu et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Keenan Novon Anderson
Defendant:
Lukumon Tiamiyu, Maxwell Eke and Amber Ocoha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tumey, et al v. Medina County, Texas
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Chancelor Tumey, Mary Tumey and Amber Lopez
Defendant:
Medina County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
