Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Legrand et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 5:2020cv01167
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bernstein and George Legrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bernstein v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv02131
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Marcy Lynn Bernstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patrick et al v. Blue II Entertainment, Inc
as 7:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hinton, Tara Leigh Patrick, Rachel Koren and others
Defendant:
Blue II Entertainment, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bernstein et al v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 4:2020cv00166
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Bernstein and Cynthia Bernstein
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services, Inc., Chattem, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
El Paso Cty v. Trump
as 19-51144
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, In his official capacity, DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, In his official capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, In his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS and BORDER NETWORK FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Amicus Curiae:
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, RICHARD BERNSTEIN, JOHN BELLINGER, III and others
Bernstein et al v. City of Austin,Texas et al
as 1:2019cv00989
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bernstein and Fernando Bernstein
Defendant:
City of Austin,Texas and Travis County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernstein v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06028
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. f/k/a Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
McGrath v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03914
Defendant:
Chih-Hsiang Lin, Stefan J. Murry and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen McGrath
Petitioner:
Ronaldo Borgogni, David Pokoik, Rigo Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pokoik v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03722
Defendant:
Chih-Hsiang Lin, Stefan J. Murry and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Petitioner:
Ronaldo Borgogni, Rigo Caudill, Stanley Nugit and others
Taneja v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03544
Defendant:
Thompson Lin, Stefan J. Murry and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gaurav Taneja, Ronaldo Borgogni, Rigo Caudill and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik and Stephen McGrath
Consolidated Defendant:
Chih-Hsiang Lin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
