Cases 11 - 20 of 6,700
Henry v. Perez et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20261
Petitioner:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Lumpkin
as 24-50471
Petitioner:
Antoine Sharod Benson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Phillips v. McCrary et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Phillips
Defendant:
Captain Unknown McCrary, Warden Donald Jackson, Lt. Mrs. Unknown Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debnam v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Kevin Debnam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Brandon Luis Marshall
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Draucker v. Lumpkin
as 24-10511
Petitioner:
James Draucker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas, Rockwall County, Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
