Cases 11 - 20 of 673
USA v. Black
as 24-50054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cortez Black
Hendricks v. Coronado
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hendricks
Defendant:
Victor Cortez Coronado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Cortez
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Tyler v. Gonzales
as 23-11202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam R. Gonzales, Warden II, individual and official capacities, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, individual and official capacities, Logan T. Shedd, FAC health Administrator, individual and official capacities and others
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corey Cortez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton et al v. Cortez et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III, Fred Johnson, Terry Mays and others
Defendant:
Patrick Page Cortez, Clay Schexnayder and John Bel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Richardson
as 3:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jerry Cortez Richardson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cortez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Cortez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Incorrectly Filed Do not docket in this case. Case correctly refiled in (2:23-cv-266).
as 4:2023cv03979
Plaintiff:
Fidel Cortez, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
