Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Henry v. Arcuri et al
as 5:2012cv01045
Defendant:
Tony Arcuri, Rodney Denton, E. Humble and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv01207
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Dept of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-20667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cager et al v. Layton Homes Corp.
as 2:2009cv08346
Defendant:
Layton Homes Corp.
Plaintiff:
Carlisse Marie Cager, Charles Henry Cager and Harriet Smith Cager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry v. Continental Airlines
as 4:2009mc00375
Plaintiff:
Hector Charles Henry
Defendant:
Continental Airlines
Henry v. Life Ins. Co. of GA, et al
as 5:2008cv00116
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of Georgia , Paul Norrell , Randy Britt and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Cager et al v. Alliance Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04084
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Cager, Sr. and Charles Henry Cager, Sr.
Defendant:
Alliance Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Troutman et al v. USAA et al
as 5:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Troutman and Flying Tiger Group, LLC
Defendant:
USAA, PHH Mortgage Services, USAA Federal Savings Bank and others
Counter Plaintiff:
USAA Savings Bank
Counter Defendant:
Charles Henry Troutman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dorsey v. Quarterman
as 08-40131
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HENRY DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
