Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Champagne et al v. Conger et al
as 2:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Melvin Champagne and Ira Landry
Defendant:
Steven L. Conger, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Encompass Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Neman v. Greater Houston All-Pro Auto Interiors LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03082
Plaintiff:
David Neman
Defendant:
Greater Houston All-Pro Auto Interiors LLC, Dent Wizard International Corporation, Kyle A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reiser v. Du Bois et al
as 4:2011cv02752
Plaintiff:
Hans Reiser
Defendant:
William H Du Bois, Robert Navarro, Richard E. Jamar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Conger
as 3:2010cv02007
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Christy Johnson Conger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conger v. The State Of Texas et al
as 4:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Conger
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, County of Collin, Texas and City Of McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conger v. Roach et al
as 4:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Conger
Defendant:
John Roach, William Nellis and Paul Key
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 5:2009cv01147
Plaintiff:
Kassandra D Fitzgerald, Roland Dee Ronnie Adams, Charles Bamburg and others
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Conger v. V J Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel Conger
Defendant:
V J Enterprises, Inc., Kevin Riley and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunter v. Conger
as 2:2007cv07334
Plaintiff:
Kianka Hunter
Defendant:
Steven Conger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
