Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jordan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc
as 6:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
James D Jordan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Jordan v Comm of SSA
as 5:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Roger D Jordan
Defendant:
Comm of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011mc00038
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Lara McIntosh and United States of America
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
James D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00075
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Lara McIntosh and United States of America
Petitioner:
James D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00076
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Lara McIntosh and United States of America
Petitioner:
James D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jordan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
as 4:2010cv02901
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Plaintiff:
Spencer D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
