Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 22-20645
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Harrison
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Burmeister
as 22-50819
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Burmeister, also known as Daniel Burmeister
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckley v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Beckley
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01048
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savath et al v. Cloud Kitchens, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
samnang savath and daniel lee
Defendant:
Cloud Kichens, LLC, 5828 Fairdale Lane Hou, LLC dba Fair Food Company, Cloud Kitchens, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frost v. Natchitoches Parish Detention
as 21-30695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant / Appellee:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Probation & Parole Natchitoches Parish, Warden Dove and others
Beggs v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Beggs
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Southern Health Partners, Dr Unknown Mingarie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spinks v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2021cv00061
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Spinks
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spinks v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00141
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Spinks
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
