Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Williams v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Barbara H. Williams
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. and Randolph Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv01912
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Williams et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 4:2016cv02370
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Williams and Kara H. Williams
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Brentwood Behavioral Healthcare of Mississippi, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00328
Petitioner:
Charles H. Williams
Respondent:
Brentwood Behavioral Healthcare of Mississippi, LLC and Jim Hood
Defendant:
David W Dogan, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2016cv00519
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Gregory v. Harmony et al
as 2:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Taurus Gregory
Defendant:
Demeka Harmony, H Williams, Nikki Prudhomme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Garcia v. H. Williams, III, et al
as 14-10398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
H. WILLIAMS, III, Smith Unit Assistant Warden, JONES, Smith Unit Assistant Warden, JOEL A. GAUNA, Smith Unit High Security Assistant Warden and others
Ruben Garcia v. H. Williams, III, et al
as 14-10312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
H. WILLIAMS, III, Smith Unit Assistant Warden, JONES, Smith Unit Assistant Warden, JOEL A. GAUNA, Smith Unit High Security Assistant Warden and others
Scholl v. Allen County Superior Court et al
as 6:2013cv00976
Plaintiff:
Lesley Marlin Scholl
Defendant:
Allen County Superior Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, Indiana Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
