Cases 11 - 20 of 209
McGee v. Hayden et al
as 6:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Karl Lynn McGee
Defendant:
NFN Hayden and Tyler Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Velasco v. Hayden
as 4:2023cv00291
Petitioner:
Mark Andrew Velasco
Respondent:
Sharon Wilson, State of Texas and Calvin Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayden v. USA
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Collin Hayden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
McGee v. Hayden et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Karl Lynn McGee
Defendant:
NFN Hayden and Tyler Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Hester et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Sheila Warner
Defendant:
Hayden Hester, Victaulic Company and Victaulic Company f/k/a Victaulic NewCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
USA v. Espinosa
as 23-40071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Hayden Michael Espinosa
Hayden v. USA
as 5:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Collin Garrett Hayden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Jung-Peters v. Child Support Division et al
as 7:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters and Magic Johnson
Defendant:
Child Support Division, Arron MP Klino, Social Security Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Steele Dynamics Southwest, LLC
as 2:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
George J Hayden George J. Hayden, Inc. d/b/a Hayden Power Group doing business as Hayden Power Group and George J Hayden, Inc. doing business as Hayden Power Group
Defendant:
Steele Dynamics Southwest, LLC and Steel Dynamics Southwest, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
