Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Havassy v. Keller Williams Realty Inc.
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAVASSY
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty Inc, PETER HEWITT and Kelly Houston
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hewitt v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Lacy Hewitt
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
USA v. Hewitt
as 22-50507
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christian Porter Hewitt
Hewitt v. W&T Offshore, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Micah Rene Hewitt
Defendant:
W&T Offshore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (Definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AFS Logistics LLC v. Tetria Global Logistics LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
AFS Logistics, LLC and AFS Logistics LLC
Defendant:
Tetria Global Logistics, LLC, Novapath Supply Chain Systems, Inc., David Proctor and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Decquir v. Bentel et al
as 2:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
xavimen decquir
Defendant:
jonathan d bentel, durand hewitt, robert johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewitt v. USA
as 3:2021cv01397
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tony R Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beneplace, Inc. v. DaVita, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Aon Hewitt Health Market Insurance Solutions, Inc. and DaVita, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Beneplace, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company v. Hewitt et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Valerie C Travers, Randy Hewitt and Steven A Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
