Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Lucas v. Marshall
as 1:2018cv00238
Defendant:
Jessie L. Marshall and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Ashley Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salazar v. Facio et al
as 3:2017cv00286
Defendant:
Erika Facio, Luis Silva and Unknown Defendants
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Edward L Marshall
Plaintiff:
Fidel Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loften v. Paton et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loften v. Paton et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Marshall
as 2:2017cv05368
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Cook
Defendant:
Preston L Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Langley et al
as 9:2016cv00191
Defendant:
Langley, Shaun B Munson, Ashley L Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Eddie Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Davis
as 1:2016cv01160
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Juan Felipe Flores
Respondent:
Judge Oscar J. Hale, Jr. and Paul Thomson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Edward L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01671
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A Marshall and David L Marshall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Dunham v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-20059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE DUNHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, VICKIE BARROW, JOHN D. SEIGLE and others
Dunham v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv03393
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Vickie Barrow, John D Seigle and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
