Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Odessa Hardwood, LLC v. Seneca Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00198
Defendant: Mark Daniel and Seneca Insurance Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Odessa Hardwood, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Gray et al v. Century Surety Company et al
as 2:2015cv00237
Plaintiff: Todd Gray and Catana Gray
Defendant: Century Surety Company and Mark Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Veal v. Kuplesky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00566
Plaintiff: James Veal
Defendant: Stephen Kuplesky, Timothy Keith, Mark Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Troice, et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11048
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, PROMOTORA VILLA MARINO, CA and others
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIS OF COLORADO INCORPORATED, WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, AMY S. BARANOUCKY and others
Appellee: MARK DANIEL MANELA
Perez v. Duke
as 7:2009cv00112
Petitioner: Mark Daniel Perez
Respondent: David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Duke
as 7:2009cv00083
Petitioner: Mark Daniel Perez
Respondent: David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fronckiewicz v. Quarterman
as 08-41093
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK DANIEL FRONCKIEWICZ
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Fronckiewicz v. Director TDCJ ID
as 9:2008cv00133
Petitioner: Mark Daniel Fronckiewicz
Respondent: Director TDCJ ID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?