Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Mark Johnson v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-50160
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woerner v. United States Of America
as 1:2015cv00011
Petitioner:
Mark William Woerner
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv01039
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Mark William Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04043
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams and Carol Williams
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Hall
as 4:2013cv02202
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark William Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Williams v. Burrow Global LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Burrow Global LLC and Industrial Engineering Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Mark Woerner
as 11-41380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM WOERNER
Belous v. USA
as 4:2011cv00560
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark William Belous
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Jones and Mark Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
