Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Richey et al v. Fed Nat Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv04203
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Martin Richey and Jeannie Richey
Defendant:
Fed Nat Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richey v. Holden
as 21-10673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Lee Richey
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Holden, Jay Holden, Billy Parker and others
Novodvorschi v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
James E. Bavousett, Gregory S. Hicks, John Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Holden et al
as 3:2021cv01012
Defendant:
Billy Parker, Jay Holden, Unknown Female Polygraph Examiner and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Fletcher
as 4:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Jeffery K. Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Adam Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Holden et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Billy Parker, Jay Holden, Unknown Female Polygraph Examiner and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Fletcher
as 4:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Jeffery K. Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Retail Ready Career Center IncIn re: Retail Ready Career Center Inc
as 20-11038
Respondent:
Lake Forest Drive Properties, Incorporated, Trades United, Incorporated, Clear Conscience, L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
In re: Retail Ready Career Center Incorporated
Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve, et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 3:2020cv00225
Plaintiff:
Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve and Houston Land & Cattle Co., L.C.
Defendant:
United States Army Corps Of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Richey James and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
