Cases 11 - 19 of 19
New Century Montessori Academy v Markel Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv02732
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company , Robert Stewart and Brush Country Claims Ltd
Plaintiff:
New Century Montessori Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01229
Plaintiff:
Robert Stewart
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Stewart et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Robert Stewart and Mildred Stewart
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson and Johnson Health Care Systems Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart v. Martin
as 1:2011cv00495
Petitioner:
Robert Stewart
Respondent:
M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv03965
Plaintiff:
Robert Stewart, III and Cynthia Stewart
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lanaville et al v. Destiny Industries, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03414
Plaintiff:
Sherri Lanaville , Trinity Lanaville , Luca Lanaville and others
Defendant:
Destiny Industries, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Stewart v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 09-30827
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Brumfield et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv01407
Plaintiff:
Donald Brumfield, Cathy Jo Fox, Annie Marie Hale and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
