Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Roy et al v. E M C Insurance Co et al
as 6:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Roy and Connie Lynn Roy
Defendant:
Cappaert Manufactured Housing Inc , William Cummins and E M C Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. National Union Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv02883
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01147
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee and Frankie Lee
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00731
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martin et al v. TIN
as 2:2011cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kermit Martin , Collin Sorrell , Rodney Lee and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. TIN, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02067
Plaintiff:
Terral Evans , Dana Evans , Charles Blanchard and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc.
Consol_plaintiff:
Kermit Martin , Collin Sorrell , Rodney Lee and others
Consol_defendant:
TIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinley v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00032
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee McKinley
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinley v. State of Texas
as 3:2011cv00039
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee McKinley
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammonds v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03473
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Hammonds
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ardoin v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv03247
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Ardoin
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
