Cases 11 - 20 of 29
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, United States of America, U.S. Department of State and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jesus, Rosa, Timoteo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hinton v. Harris County
as 21-20550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candice Hinton, Individually as personal representative of the Estate of Rodrin Hinton and as parent and natural guardian of her minor children R.H. and CH and next friend of for IH and KH, State of Alaska, as ward of A.H., Brittany Kuka, parent and guardian of K.H. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Harris County, care of Honorable Ed Emmentt
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
