Cases 11 - 20 of 244
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01996
Plaintiff:
Van Shaw
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Rene G. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green, Jr v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Green, Jr
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local Union No 568 and Local 568 International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Garza v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Brandon Garza
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
AKHTER et al v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
MOSAMMAT AKHTER, MOHAMMAD KARIM and JAWAD KARIM
Defendant:
JOHN PATRICK MOONEY, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
