Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Hakim Johnson
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Christopher Epps, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald Smith v. Ronald Woodall, et al
as 16-60080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD KEITH SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WOODALL, MICHAEL HATTEN, JOSEPH KEYES and others
Mack Lambert v. Ronald Woodall, et al
as 16-60061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MACK LAMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR RONALD E. WOODALL, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, FORREST GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Brown v. April Megg, et al
as 15-60706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
APRIL MEGG, DR. RON WOODALL and WEXFORD HEALTH
Corry Fulford v. Gloria Perry, et al
as 15-60624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORRY FULFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
GLORIA PERRY, WILSON PARRY, PAXTON PAIGE and others
Jackson v. Wexford Health et al
as 3:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Roland Abangan, Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Lee v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 15-60568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS O'NEAL LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Individual and official capacity, E. L. SPARKMAN, Individual and official capacity and others
Chandler v. Wexford Health et al
as 4:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Joey Montell Chandler
Defendant:
Wexford Health, MDOC, Juan Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
