Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Acevedo v. Duncan-Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Nancy Acevedo
Defendant:
Sueann Duncan-Walker and Janet L. Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
York v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Samuel Il'Lester York, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Martinez and FNU 5:23-CV-075 Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Castaneda-Acevedo
as 23-50350
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Castaneda-Acevedo
USA v. Castaneda-Acevedo
as 23-50352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Castaneda-Acevedo, also known as Jose Castaneda-Acebedo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00701
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Herrera v. Wells Fargo Brokerage Services et al
as 4:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Samuel K. Herrera
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Financial Responsibility Department Division, Larry Bensussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. KTRK-TV ABC 13 News et al
as 4:2019cv03772
Defendant:
45 Univision, Rehan Aslam, Troy Finner and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny T Taylor, Demetria Smith and Derek Broze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Acevedo
as 22-20534
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Austin Thompson Hughes
Defendant / Appellant:
Art Acevedo, Michael Garcia, Joshua Few and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
