Cases 21 - 30 of 1,424
Push Data LLC v. Lane Bryant Inc.
as 4:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Defendant:
Lane Bryant Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Watts v. Lumpkin
as 24-20004
Petitioner:
Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Breion Smith and Bryant Alonzo
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company, Biloxi Auto Recycling, Inc., Lonny Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bryant v. Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS)-Federal
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Clifton Bryant, Jr.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS)-Federal and Brendan G. Stuhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rios v. Cummings et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings and D. Gordont Bryant, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Bryant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jayla Bryant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Fabbri v. Sgt. Edwina D. Bryant et al
as 4:2023cv04724
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fabbri
Defendant:
Sgt. Edwina D. Bryant, Sgt. Giselle Njimitchoufong, Warden Quintanal Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson et al v. SPI Holdings, LLC
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hudson and Julius Bryant
Defendant:
SPI Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lodge et al v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Bryant Lodge and Edris Lodge
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc. d/b/a Chrysler Capital, Quick Track Asset Recovery and Santander Consumer USA Inc. doing business as Chrysler Capital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
