Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Clay et al v. Flounderdawg, LLC et al
as 5:2018mc00253
Movant:
Daniel Crisp
Respondent:
Joshua Kennedy , Matthew Arneson , Arthur Charles and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Clay
Defendant:
Flounderdawg, LLC, Sam McAnear and Daniel Crisp
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lavergne v. Crisp et al
as 2:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lavergne
Defendant:
Brian Crisp and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisp v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02859
Plaintiff:
Renee Crisp
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisp v. Ballard
as 5:2017cv00867
Defendant:
Noah Ballard
Plaintiff:
Justin Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crisp v. USA
as 4:2017cv00410
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Randy Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crisp et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00090
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Cantrell Crisp and Naomi L Cantrell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Crisp v. Gucci Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Betty Crisp
Defendant:
Godwin Duru, Ugonna Duru and Gucci Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Crisp v. First Care Home Health Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Betty Crisp
Defendant:
First Care Home Health Services, LLC, Paul Inameti and Sylvia E. Inameti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reuben Crisp v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 17-30127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REUBEN MICHAEL CRISP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, JERRY GOODWIN, PAMELA HEARN and others
Quarles et al v. Talisman Energy USA, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00356
Defendant:
Talisman Energy USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Jean Crisp Quarles and Donald W. Quarles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
