Cases 21 - 30 of 71
USA v. David Wallace
as 19-10589
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID RAY WALLACE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brooks v. Zelesport et al
as 3:2019cv01226
Defendant:
David Ray Zelsdorf, Mid-South Lumber Company of Georgia, Inc., David Ray Zelesport and others
Plaintiff:
LeJuan Cecilia Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Atwood v. Ronald Punch, et al
as 19-20033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RAY ATWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, MATTHEW K. MCCLAIN, DOYLE DAVIS and others
Harrell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09812
Plaintiff:
David Ray Harrell
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Johnson v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv01091
Plaintiff:
David Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Richland Parish Detention Center, Sgt Holcutt, Ricky Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Atwood v. Punch et al
as 4:2018cv01844
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Ronald C Punch, Dolye Davis, Mattew K. McClarin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood v. Punch et al
as 4:2018cv01711
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Ronald C Punch, Doyle Davis, Matthew K. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eudy v. University Of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 6:2018cv00017
Petitioner:
David Ray Eudy
Respondent:
University of Texas Medical Branch , Gary Wright , Virginia Shafer and others
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny v. Hopkins County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 4:2017cv00781
Plaintiff:
David Ray Penny
Defendant:
Hopkins County Law Enforcement Center, Lewis Tatum and FNU Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
