Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Alana Cain v. New Orleans City, et al
as 17-30597
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. KAZIK, Judicial Administrator, LAURIE A. WHITE, Judge, Section A of the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, TRACEY FLEMINGS-DAVILLIER, Judge, Section B of the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court and others
Adrian Caliste v. Harry Cantrell
as 17-30599
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY E. CANTRELL, Magistrate Judge of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court
Schmidt v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00315
Petitioner:
David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gillespie v. Talisman Energy USA, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Gillespie
Defendant:
Talisman Energy USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Boyd v. City of Round Rock and its Police Department
as 1:2017cv00251
Defendant:
Alain Babin, Allen Banks, City of Round Rock and its Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. David Diehl
as 16-51455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW DIEHL, also known as David A. Diehl
In Re: Deepwater Horizon
as 16-30918
Defendant - Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INCORPORATED, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and BP, P.L.C.
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
USA v. Kenneth Bowen, et al
as 16-30529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
USA v. David Diehl
as 15-51061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW DIEHL, also known as David A. Diehl
David Schmidt v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10707
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
