Cases 21 - 30 of 282
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Detillier v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv05193
Plaintiff:
Drew Detillier
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company and United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Colbert v. Buggs et al
as 2:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
lance colbert
Defendant:
Drew Buggs, CSAA Insurance Exchange, CSAA Insurance Exchange Incorrectly named Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange doing business as AAA Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Schlumbrecht et al v. Topel et al
as 2:2022cv02111
Defendant:
Andrew V Topel, Atlas Software Services doing business as Atlas Software Productions and Drew Topel
Plaintiff:
National Table Games Corporation and Thomas C.A. Schlumbrecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis v. USA
as 4:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
Dustin Drew Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Campbell v. Booth
as 22-40340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adrian Campbell
Defendant / Appellee:
Patricia Hubert Booth, individually, Jason Bradford Libby, individually, Drew B. Tipton, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
