Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Growing by Design LLC v. Spherical Dynamics, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00755
Plaintiff:
Growing By Design LLC
Defendant:
Spherical Dynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hubert Arvie v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 12-31000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUBERT ARVIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, GERALD LEBO, Assistant Warden and others
Arvie v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv01638
Plaintiff:
Hubert Arvie
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Gerald Lebo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
La Grow v. Demel et al
as 6:2012cv00098
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Demel and Heart of Texas Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Errol La Grow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grows v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01370
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debra Grows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antonio Tyson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 11-30043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO TYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, ROBERT TANNER, Warden and LARRY GROW, Colonel
Directv, Inc. v. Grow et al
as 4:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan Darwin Grow and Jonathan Grow Interests LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Carter et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Claude Gibson Carter , Carter Plantation Limited , William Alfred Patridge and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Bioscience NV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyson v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2010cv01174
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Tyson
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Robert C Tanner and Larry Grow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry James v. Ronald Branch, et al
as 09-31232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD BRANCH, BOBBI JO BRELAND, RANDALL WHALEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
