Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-50033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vargas et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Vargas and Alicia Garcia Martinez
Defendant:
Michael T Freeman , Eliseo Cabrera , Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benavides v. Napolitano et al
as 7:2010cv00377
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Benavides
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Hillary Rodham Clinton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mendoza et al v. Clinton et al
as 4:2010cv02035
Petitioner:
Roberto Pintor Mendoza and Norma Ramirez Hernandez
Respondent:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Sandra Heathman, Ruth A Dorochoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 - Immigration and Nationality
Moreno v. Clinton et al
as 6:2010cv00274
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, US Attorney Eastern District of Texas, Raymond McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Garza v. Clinton - DO NOT DOCKET IN B10CV103. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER B07CV218.
as 1:2010cv00103
Petitioner:
HUGO CESAR GARZA
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mendoza v. U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas et al
as 3:2010cv00861
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Raymond McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Maribel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
