Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Jobe v. Davis
as 6:2018cv00399
Defendant:
Lori Davis
Plaintiff:
William Walter Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jobe v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Glenda Jobe
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jobe v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co
as 3:2017cv01612
Plaintiff:
Barbara Suszonne Jobe
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobe et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv15100
Plaintiff:
George Jobe and Lina Jobe
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson and Johnson Company, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jobe v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv00753
Petitioner:
Christopher Jobe
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jobe v. Grand Peaks Property Management Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01124
Plaintiff:
Linda Jobe
Defendant:
Grand Peaks Property Managment Inc and D Vineyards LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jobes et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02914
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jobes and William Jobes
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jobe v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00119
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
