Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Hull v. Lee County Adult Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Lee County Adult Jail, Jamie Burrell and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eleopoulos v. Lee Co Tupelo Adult Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Lee Co Tupelo Adult Jail and Medical Dept
Plaintiff:
Michael Clinton Eleopoulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Meetze v. Ron King, et al.
as 3:2021cv00021
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
J. Farmer, Miller, Ron King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv01376
Plaintiff:
Darian Carter
Defendant:
Medical Staff Morehouse Parish Detention Center, Medical Staff Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Ike Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meetze v. CMCF Medical Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv00181
Defendant:
L. Sutton, Warden Miller, J. Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rike v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, UTMB Legal Department and others
Plaintiff:
James E Rike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelm v. Tigner et al
as 3:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Billy Tigner, Medical Dept of Madison Parish Correctional Center and Dwayne Saucier
Plaintiff:
Terrance James Kelm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battles v. Desoto County Jail Staff et al
as 3:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Desoto County Jail Medical Dept., Desoto County Mississippi, Desoto County Jail Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Battles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Spurlock v. Medical Dept East Baton Rouge Parish Prison
as 3:2019cv00802
Defendant:
Medical Dept East Baton Rouge Parish Prison
Plaintiff:
Ezra Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. TDCJ Medical Dept.
as 4:2019cv04416
Plaintiff:
Ennis Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
TDCJ Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
