Cases 21 - 30 of 32
King et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04553
Plaintiff:
Michael King and Deborah J King
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. DCOMM, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00898
Defendant:
Hakan Baltaoglu and DCOMM, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Joshua Conlan v. Michael King, et al
as 13-50221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KING, Detective #4127, Austin Police Department and JOHN DOES 1-5, Police Officers, Austin Police Department
Conlan v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Michael King, Brett Magill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlan v. King et al
as 3:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-60265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-60135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stanford v. Korotosh et al
as 4:2011cv00582
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
Stephen Korotosh, David Reece, Kevin Edmundson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael King, Jr. v. Bluecross Blueshield of AL, et al
as 10-31134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF ALABAMA and LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY CO, also known as BlueCross Blueshield of Louisiana
King v. Bluecross Blueshield of Alabama et al
as 3:2010cv00418
Defendant:
BlueCross Blueshield of Alabama and Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Michael King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
