Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Morgan v. Patten et al
as 5:2018cv00131
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County MS et al
as 5:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County MS, Adams County Circuit Court, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Board of Supervisors
as 5:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Board of Supervisors and Travis Patten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Elijha T. Hall
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept., Travis B. Patten and Tony Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Dukes v. United States Patten Trademack Office
as 3:2017cv02508
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
United States Patten Trademack Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept. and Travis Patten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patten v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07113
Plaintiff:
Patricia Patten
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Patten-Steiger v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05869
Plaintiff:
Bernice Van Patten-Steiger
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Patten et al
as 1:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Edward Leon Patten, Lula Granger Patten and Bebe Grant Patten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
