Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Charles Reed v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50306
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES RAY REED
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Charles Reed v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50304
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES RAY REED
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Charles Reed v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50307
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES RAY REED
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Arnold Reed v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-11298
Petitioner - Appellant: ARNOLD RAY REED
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Reed v. Stephens et al
as 4:2013cv02384
Plaintiff: Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant: William Stephens, R Walton, Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00397
Plaintiff: Ray Reed
Defendant: Linda Harris, Linda Wiggins, Latasha McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
In re: Arnold Reed
as 13-10569
Movant: In re: ARNOLD RAY REED
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv02503
Plaintiff: Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant: Rick Thaler, John Adams, Geneta Gleen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv00460
Plaintiff: Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant: Rick Thaler, John Adams, Geneta Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Faulkner et al
as 3:2011cv00141
Plaintiff: Ray Reed
Defendant: Lee Faulkner, Sharon Johnson, Daphne Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?