Cases 21 - 30 of 698
Vargas v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Maria Vargas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Vargas and Raquel Ludim Ruiz
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and Secretary Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shaw v. Dickson et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Juston Shaw
Defendant:
Brent Dickson, Sgt. Vargas, Sgt. Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Vargas-Martinez
as 24-40028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franco Aniel Vargas-Martinez
USA v. Valenzuela Vargas
as 24-10028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jared Valenzuela Vargas
USA v. Vargas Velez
as 24-40019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Angel Vargas Velez
Vargas et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ramon Vargas and Rosalda Vargas
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Certificate Number LL4132-06 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mondragon v. Tirado Simental et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jose Porfirio Mondragon
Defendant:
Israel Ramon Tirado Simental, NEVB and Norma Estela Vargas Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
