Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Wiseman v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv01063
Petitioner:
Dorothy Fraizer Wiseman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wiseman et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv16224
Plaintiff:
Lois Wiseman and Harold Wiseman
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiseman v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00954
Petitioner:
Dorthy Fraizer Wiseman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wiseman v. USA
as 4:2015cv00732
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dorothy Fraizer Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trahan et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sarah Trahan , Theodric Trumps , Terry Don Valyon and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CDx Holdings, Inc. et al v. Heddon et al
as 3:2013cv03491
Plaintiff:
CDx Holdings Inc and Miraca Life Sciences Inc
Defendant:
David Heddon , Poplar Healthcare Management, LLC , Andrew Wiseman and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Dorothy Wiseman
as 13-10089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOROTHY FRAIZER WISEMAN, also known as Dot
Alliance Wireless Technologies Inc v. Casella-Wiseman
as 3:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
Alliance Wireless Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Marie Casella-Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Tharpe et al v. Wiseman
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
R. Bruce Tharpe , Christopher J. Ronquillo , Fredric G. Rubenstein and others
Defendant:
Jerry Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
