Cases 21 - 30 of 11,829
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rath v. Wingfield et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Emil Roland Rath, II
Defendant:
Warden Barry Wingfield and FCC Yazoo City Low-I
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kennedy v. Richland Parish et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
David M Kennedy, Jr
Defendant:
District Attorney Richland Parish, Warden Wade and Warden Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Shundray Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres-Sosa v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Torres-Sosa
Defendant:
Warden Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chavez v. Hijar
as 24-50427
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
