Cases 21 - 30 of 1,399
Baustista v. Wilkinson
as 21-60085
Respondent:
Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting U.S. Attorney General and William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Maria Arias Baustista
Mtaza v. Wilkinson
as 20-11220
Petitioner / Appellant:
Amon Rweyemamu Mtaza
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cargill v. Wilkinson
as 20-51016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Cargill
Defendant / Appellee:
Regina Lombardo, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivas Rodriguez v. Carrol
as 20-20592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Santiago Arturo Rivas Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Lee Francis Cissna, Attorney General William Pelham Barr, Bryan P. Christian and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01126
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tzul Lacan v. Rosen
as 20-61229
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General and Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Juan Gabriel Tzul Lacan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerson Cruz Ventura v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61203
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jerson Obdulio Cruz Ventura
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
