Cases 31 - 40 of 36,834
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sumrall v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00578
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Sumrall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Planet Home Lending, LLC v. McDonald et al
as 4:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Planet Home Lending, LLC
Defendant:
Adrianne Todman, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, John Walker, Jr, Clifford McDonald, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Askew v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Allen Askew
Defendant:
Lori K Redmond, Taylor Maza, Wardens of B Clements Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallett v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00129
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-129-O and Bailey Jones
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diogu II v. George et al
as 4:2024cv03590
Defendant:
Hon. KP George, Charles G Norvell, James A. Eleckel and others
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu II, L.L.M
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv03594
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
