Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Keys v. Energy X X I G O M L L C
as 6:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keys
Defendant:
Energy XXI G O M L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Energy XXI G O M L L C
as 6:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Harold Mitchell
Defendant:
Energy XXI G O M L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julius Evans v. M. Phommahaxay, et al
as 15-10131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS CURTIS EVANS, also known as Julius Evans, also known as Julius C. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
M. L. PHOMMAHAXAY, BRAD LIVINGSTON, BARRY L. MARTIN and others
DuPree v. Ray et al
as 6:2014cv00829
Plaintiff:
Michael DuPree
Defendant:
M L Ray and FNU Montiguado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Evans v. Livingston et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
B Livingston, Barry L Martin, James Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Phommahaxay et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
M L Phommahaxay, Brad Livingston, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M & L Rose Enterprises Inc v. West Junction Inc
as 3:2013cv04523
Defendant:
West Junction Inc
Plaintiff:
M & L Rose Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hunt Building Company, Limited, et al v. John Hancock Life Ins Co., et al
as 13-50747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUNT BUILDING COMPANY, LIMITED, A Texas Limited Partnership, M. L. HUNT, W. L. HUNT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Michigan Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. and JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Barnes v. Romeo Papa, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Brian Barnes
Defendant:
Romeo Papa, LLC and M&L Engine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
